Geek Out Online » Blog Archive » Boldly Going Where GOO Has Never Gone Before – Star Trek Reviewed

Boldly Going Where GOO Has Never Gone Before – Star Trek Reviewed



Posted by Steve

StarTrekMoviePoster.jpegThis is one of the harder reviews for a movie I’ve written to date. It’s hard not because I’m a Star Wars fan and I liked Star Trek, or because I’m a Star Wars fan and I didn’t like Star Trek, or because I think I’m eating a big ole steaming pile of crow, or for any reason that has to do with all of my jokes about Trekkies. It’s a hard review to write because, quite frankly, I was prepared to write a glowing review of a Star Trek movie. I was ready to completely gush over what J.J. Abrams brought to the big screen and the final frontier. I was ready to enthusiastically call for sequel upon sequel. I was beefing up on all my Star Wars defenses getting ready to have to more strenuously defend my Star Franchise of choice. However, This is just a regular movie review. Why? This movie was good my friends, but it was no Star Wars.

When I first heard that J.J. Abrams was relaunching the Star Trek franchise I was intrigued and kind of excited. I felt like Star Trek didn’t get the send off theatrically that it deserved. Regardless of what you may think about Nemesis, the Next Gen crew deserved a better, more epic end to their tales on the big screen. As different Star Trek alum have passed over the recent years, the idea of seeing Kirk, Spock, Bones, Scotty, and the crew on the big screen ever again was relegated to special screenings of the original movies. Now, someone was actually putting it all out there. Someone was doing the unthinkable…recasting these roles. Trek fans everywhere stood back aghast at the thought. The questions of William Shatner showing up began to be asked. Leonard Nimoy was suddenly on board, and people scratched their heads. Pictures leaked. Stills were realeased. People debated, bemoaned, and some were excited at the prospect.

Then, that teaser hit with Cloverfield almost a year and a half ago. As Nimoy uttered those iconic words, the debate stopped, the moaning and whining stopped, if only for a bit, because regardless of a person’s opinion of what was happening to Trek, that teaser got us all excited.

In the months leading up to it’s release, I truly thought Star Trek was gonna steal the Summer show. I thought it was gonna be THE picture of 2009. I was sure that when it hit theaters, the Summer would just be a downhill ride from there.

Don’t get me wrong, Star Trek was good. But it wasn’t “end all, be all” good.

From the outset, let me say again that J.J. Abrams and crew have done the unthinkable and pulled it off. Like Scotty pulling nearly warp 10 out of a Klingon Bird of Prey, J.J. Abrams coaxed everything he could out of Star Trek and put it all on the screen in a way no one has ever seen Star Trek before.

There’s so much good about this movie, that it’s hard to know where to begin.

I really like the introduction to Kirk and Spock. The idea that these two characters are rebels in their own way on their respective planets show us how it is that they can become such good friends years down the road. They have an understanding of one another before they ever truly meet. These two are, understandably, the focal points in terms of the cast throughout much of the movie. It’s Kirk and Spock, and if these characters aren’t done right, then the movie fails.

Chris Pine is my new James T. Kirk. I completely believed him in the role. I loved that he had all of the swagger that everyone has always told me Kirk had. You see, I have never seen Kirk as the cool ladies man that everyone says he is. So to see Chris Pine try to pick up Uhura at a bar and fail, but not be daunted by it, and later hooking up with a green chick (Original series joke in and of itself), and throughout all of his tests, trials, and troubles still maintain a wit and charm not seen since Han Solo makes me like Kirk more than I ever have.

Zachary Quinto was an inspired choice to cast as Spock. He brings to the table all of the necessary elements to play the Vulcan Science Officer, and in this new version of the character is allowed a little more emotional room to work with. He does this excellently. He gets emotional without getting emotional and when he DOES finally explode, it’s scary and we are reminded that Spock is not one to be trifled with.

Zoe Saldana portrays the Uhura that Trekkies have always loved, with some 21st century sensibilities that weren’t there when the character was originally conceived. Things have changed a bit since the original series aired and the presence of a strong female character on screen isn’t as revolutionary as it once was. However, because we are willing to accept more from our female characters, Saldana is able to take the character of Uhura to places we’ve never seen the character go before. We get to see more passion than I recall in the character and it only serves to make Uhura more interesting than she’s ever been to me.

John Cho’s Sulu is probably the most problematic of the crew for me. Mainly because I can’t help but see Harold from the Harold and Kumar movies. Also, one of the coolest things about Sulu to me was his voice. Unfortunately, Harold doesn’t have the weight and deep timbre of voice that George Takai has and it causes his character to not stand out for me. However, Sulu was given more to do in this movie than he was in any of the previous movies. Harold was great in his action sequence with Kirk.

I’m not familiar with Anton Yelchin outside of this movie, but I like what he did with Chekov. Having said that though, do we really need Chekov?

Simon Pegg was great as Scotty. He brings the fun and the wonder to the character that we all expect from Scotty.

Karl Urban, however, stole the show from everyone for me. My favorite moments were when Dr. Leonard McCoy was on screen. Urban captured the voice of McCoy perfectly, both literally and figuratively. From his introduction (“All I got left is m’bones.”) to the “I’m a doctor” line, he was perfect as Bones, and the fact that he and Kirk strike up a friendship from their first meeting is so fitting. I can’t think of anyone more suited to step into the role after seeing what Urban did with the character. As I walked out of the theater, it was with Urban that I was most pleased.

Then there’s the story.

I liked the way that each member of the classic Enterprise crew came into their positions. I liked that Kirk basically forced his way onto the ship. I liked that Kirk and Spock are initially at odds with each other. I liked that the crew of the Enterprise came together to overcome overwhelming odds and save Earth and the Federation.

I don’t know how I feel about the time travel aspect. Honestly, going in I knew that Spock would be traveling back in time, but I didn’t expect it to be such a major portion of the story. I didn’t expect the entire story to revolve around time travel, and I didn’t expect all of Trek history to be altered by this one story.

I think that’s the catching point for me. While it took guts for J.J. Abrams and crew to do a full on reboot of the Star Trek franchise, it feels a bit contrived and scared of Trekkies to say, “Well, we may be doing something new, but it doesn’t in any way undo what you have come to know and love.” I just don’t like the idea of throwing in time travel to explain away every discrepancy in the new franchise and the old. How about this…How about it’s A NEW FRANCHISE! THINGS ARE GONNA BE DIFFERENT!

The villain of Nero had his moments, but in the end, it was a character anyone could have played. Eric Bana is too good of an actor to throw into a role that could have been given to anyone wiling to wear the makeup. In fact, Nero had the same problems that most Trek villains have. There is an attempt at some emotional depth and dynamic characterization, but it falls flat in light of the big scheme to take down the Federation. Hopefully, we’ll see more compelling villains in the future.

There are other points I could nitpick. The Kobiyashi Maru (I have no idea if that’s spelled right) Test was something that I loved hearing about Kirk beating in Star Trek 2, but I imagined differently. I always imagined Kirk ripping off a computer panel in the middle of the test and reprogramming it while the simulator was blowing up around him. While it is understood that the green chick fixed things for him, it is never clearly explained. So a scene that should have been great fell a bit flat for me.

Kirk on an ice planet has been done before. A drop of the lava lamp liquid causes a black hole that consumes a planet, but the Enterprise can escape the effects of an exercise ball sized amount of the stuff? The creatures on teh ice planet reminded me of Star Wars moments. (Always a bigger fish.) Spock and Uhura having a relationship added nothing to the movie. And, I’m sorry…but did I see HYPERSPACE LINES starting to form as the Enterprise was about to jump to warp speed for the first time. Go check it out…you’ll see what I’m talking about.

As I sat and watched this film, there was so much that reminded me of so much else. That is a problem. Star Trek shouldn’t be inspired by other franchises. (Even Star Wars) Star Trek should be setting the standard. Unfortunately, that’s not what happened in this movie.

Overall, however, Star Trek is an awesome movie. It is a great start to what is hopefully a new series of films for the franchise. The cast is so strong that I want to see these characters on screen again for anything.

Michael Giacchino’s score is definitely worth picking up and adds a lot to the movie. I like the fact that he avoided the temptation of using variations of the classic Star Trek theme throughout and waited til the ending credits to give us classic Star Trek music. His score works so well for the moments. It feels epic and adventurous. It’s powerful and moving. It works. It just works so well.

ILM’s effect work was…well, it’s ILM…they cut their teeth on space movies. (STAR WARS)

In the end, I give Star Trek a 4 out of 5. While 4 seems better than what I think, 3 seems too low, so I’ll go with the more positive review of 4 out of 5.

Yes, friends, Star Trek was good…but it was no Star Wars.

16 Responses to “Boldly Going Where GOO Has Never Gone Before – Star Trek Reviewed”

  1. Superclerk Says:

    I’m pretty sure they didn’t set out to replace Star Wars with this movie. They just wanted to make a good flick. And I think they pulled that off perfectly. They made a movie that gave the nod to the original all while still doing their own thing.
    I like your review but I’m sad to see that the movie suffered for you due to it not wiping the floor with your beloved franchise. But I am glad you had fun with it.

  2. rlfoster Says:

    Agreed, for the most part.

    I didn’t enjoy the movie as much as you, and would certainly not call it “awesome.” There were points at which I was rolling my eyes (swollen hands). Also, I don’t think anyone seriously expected this to be a Star Wars level movie. To those who did, I say, “Really??”

    I don’t think any individual Star Trek movie could fairly be compared to Star Wars. However, the franchise as a whole certainly stands out, and should be revered for what it is and what it did in its time.

    Here’s the deal, I make no bones about the fact that I’m a big Star Trek fan (pun intended). And, I’m not the type of fan to look for every little thing to tie back to the Star Trek cannon. However, I did have a big problem with “all of Trek history to be altered by this one story.” It was a bit of a slap in the face, IMO.

    For me, this was a hollowed out Star Trek story with none of the heart that made me love the franchise. It was an enjoyable, summer popcorn movie, nothing more. 🙁

  3. Sefjoe Says:

    I hate being that dude who comes in with all the nit picky answers but… they’ve been doing to “SUBSPACE” Lines since Insurrection.

  4. Big Honkin' Steve Says:

    This review was informed by so much. I really did have high expectations of the film. I really wasn’t going to go too much into the whole “vs. Star Wars” thing, but then someone spoke up on the forums in a huge way and I saw that prior to the movie. Raised the expectation bar higher.

    As to the HYPERSPACE LINES…they were in Insurrection? Well, two things then:

    1. It’s still a ripoff (If that offends you, read homage) to hyperspace lines.

    2. It’s still a ripoff of hyperspace lines. (If that offends you…read…uhm…RIPOFF)

    Truthfully, as much as I enjoyed Star Trek, I’m still missing Summer 2008.

  5. Kevin J Says:

    Great review Steve. I agree, the weakest parts of this movie were in the story. A great movie, just not a Summer Blockbuster.

  6. Ron Says:

    Loved the movie

  7. starkiller Says:

    My sister (major Trekkie) said pretty much the same things about it that you did. I may not get to see it myself until the DVD comes out.

    I’ve read many of the books and changing the timeline has been done several times, usually changing it to the way we have always known instead of from the way we have always known it to be. Also, Uhura has been a stronger and more interesting character in some of the books than she was in any of the movies.

  8. Superclerk Says:

    “I did have a big problem with “all of Trek history to be altered by this one story.” It was a bit of a slap in the face, IMO.”

    But it wasn’t altered. It’s stated very clearly in the movie that we are dealing with an alternate time line. All of the Trek of the past is still there and now we have this new time line that runs next to it. Think of it in Trek terms… this is an alternate time line much like the Mirror, Mirror time line. It doesn’t take anything away from what we have seen before.

    As for the “rip off” of the stars making lines as they go faster… is this something that can be Star Wars exclusive? Isn’t it just a representation of common physics?
    If we want to take sides on what is ripping of what then all we have to do is point at the original Star Wars and state as a fact that it is a rip off of the film The Hidden Fortress.

  9. raj Says:



  10. SuperClerk Says:

    Yes… Terminator!

  11. Dave in the Quiet Corner Says:

    I wouldn’t put this movie on the same level as last summer’s Dark Knight. I have no problem with Steve giving the movie 4 out of 5 stars. No shame there. I tell people it wasn’t great but it sure was a lot of fun. As it compares to Star Wars remember this, three and a half of the Star wars movies weren’t “Star Wars ” either.

  12. ScarlettLynn Says:

    I absolutely loved it. It was easily a 5 out of 5 for me. The characterizations were all perfect, the action and effects were great, the music was great. I thought the story was a great balance of respecting the old and completely embracing the new.

    The sad parts made me sad. The funny parts made me laugh. The romantic parts made me “squeee”. The friendships we saw developing made me completely nostalgic because they were right out of Classic Trek. And the action had me totally amped up.

    I couldn’t ask for more from a good movie-going experience.

  13. starkiller Says:

    I got to see it yesterday. It was better than Dark Knight, way better.

  14. Mike Boatner Says:

    Your last line said it all. As hard as you tried to not compare it to Star Wars, in the end, you just couldn’t help yourself. I absolutely LOVED this movie. It’s exactly what Star Trek needed to revive itself. I love both ST and SW, but for much different reasons. I don’t think it’s fair to compare the two. I agree with with ScarlettLynn. It was a great movie going experience. I am glad you saw fit anyway, to give it 4 out of 5 “Stars” (yuk yuk yuk…). At least you enjoyed it somewhat. I’m psyched about a sequel.

    P.S. – I can’t believe you’re a youth director. Let us know if you’re ever in the Atlanta area. I’d like to meet you….

  15. Sam, the Other Guy Says:

    Hey Steve, great review. Just want to highlight a few things real quick:

    – Karl Urban as McCoy was probably my favorite character in the film. I think his performance had a very nice balance of “homage to DeForrest Kelly” and “try a new spin on the character.”

    – I agree that a chunk of the Ice Planet was unnessisary. Don’t know if you caught it, but if you take the head from the first monster, put it on the second monster’s body, it’s the big bad monster from Cloverfield.

    – Nero’s emotional sturggled is covered a ton in the “prequal” graphic novel, Star Trek Countdown (I think that’s what it’s called).

    – OK, I’m not trying to outright defend this film, and I respect your opinion about this film and Star Wars, but honestly, in my opinion, comparing Trek and Wars is like comparing cowboys and knights. Yeah, they’re set in space, but really, with few exceptions, the similarities end there. And- I think I’m really gonna get boo- ed for this- I liked this flick a little more that “The Prequals.” A little bit.

    Wow, I feel like I should try to get back on your good side after this message! I love the podcast and the site, I really do! Keep up the great work!!

  16. PickettJennifer30 Says:

    When you’re in uncomfortable position and have got no money to go out from that, you would require to take the business loans. Because that will help you unquestionably. I get term loan every time I need and feel myself OK because of that.

Leave a Reply